The so-called elite are only regarded as this because they have created a a
world where they and their offspring become ever more wealthy, while
we, the worker ants, become poorer. I have just been listening to the
radio about quantitative easing. This is where the government prints
money that it doesn't have, to pretend that it will stimulate growth
in the economy. The money will be given to banks to pay off their
debts which will leave them free to lend money. Thank God for that: we
can trust bankers to be totally selfless. The money goes to the
establishment, making them even more obscenely wealthy, while we can't
get a mortgage for a house to live in! The government could have done
something quite radical to stimulate growth. There is no certainty
that quantitative easing will work, the banks probably won't lend the money and people will not spend, which will shrink the economy. But
the money that has been printed will have to be found somewhere, so we
will be even worse off (if that's possible?)
The
money that they are proposing to spend in order to make rich people
richer is the equivalent of £10,000 per head for each British
citizen. Why don't they just give £10,000 to each citizen instead? It may
seem a crazy idea, but just think about it. They are spending that
amount anyway, it's just going to obscenely wealthy people instead of
obscenely poor people. If they did this, people could pay off their
debts. They might even have enough for a deposit on a small house.
The money will be spent in the economy, and surely this will stimulate
more growth, both in banking and in retail? Even if people squander
the money, it will still be spent and create more wealth! Just a
thought.
This
week the Tory MP James Arbuthnot claimed that he was coming out as
an atheist, and that because he wasn't standing for election, he felt he
could come clean. What a load of bollocks! Britain is on the whole a
very tolerant country and also very secular. I would go as far as
saying that Christians get a harder time than other religions and
atheists. Ed Miliband announced years ago that he was an atheist,
lots of other MPs have said that they are not religious. It makes no
difference what religion you are, as long as you put the British
people first and not yourself. This is what this idiot is doing
right now, as it has given him press coverage and he is soon to be out
of work!
Also,
the Pope in response to Charlie Hebdo releasing their latest
publication, said that if someone insulted his mother, he would punch
them on the nose. What a dick! Does he not think the situation is
inflamed enough? I was unfortunate enough to be brought up in a
Catholic household. I seem to remember something about turning the
other cheek? I'm a trained fighter and I wouldn't hit anyone for bad
mouthing my mother, and I'm an atheist (I'm not up for re-election
either).
I'm
sure that Mrs Pope is quite a nice, understanding old lady (I don't
want to get punched on the nose). She does, after all, have a son who wears a dress and says he represents an invisible being! But what if
his mother sanctioned people being shot in the street? What if she
thought it a good idea to protect paedophiles? Should we call her
then? What if she didn't want girls to have an education or for women
to have contraception, could we call her then? What if she claimed
that gay people were a sin against God and should be killed for this?
What if she said that it was wrong to marry someone who was a gentile, surely this is racism, is this not wrong? Maybe sometimes it does
us all good to sit down and have a good long look at our families. Just because you're related to someone, it doesn't make them good
people!
Back to
the Charlie Hebdo magazine, is it me, or are the cartoons not funny? I
have looked at them, and they do seem to be offensive for the sake of
being offensive. We need to have satirical publications poking fun at
the establishment: this highlights the stupidity of both them, and us
for putting up with them! But the skill of a good satirist is to make
a point with the use of humour. The Charlie Hebdo cartoons do seem to
be more like a playground bully, just criticizing for the sake of it.
Politicians and religion are very easy targets. They could at least
make it funny?
I see
that prince Andrew is alleged to have had sex with an underaged
girl. When the allegations were put to him this week he responded
with, “My focus is on my work”. Good, that's sorted that then! Why
do the people of this country hold these inbred parasites in such
high regard? If someone had made that allegation about me, I would be
arrested. It seems like nearly all the entertainment industry of
seventies Britain have had their houses and their lives turned upside
down by what, in lots of cases, have been vicious lies. He gets
accused and the Palace says no, he didn't do it, then sends him away
until it all blows over and all is forgotten! Why is this, is he
above the law? I do remember my father once telling me that the Queen
couldn't be tried in one of her courts. Does this extend to her larvae
as well? I thought that Ollie Cromwell made the royals accountable to
the people, sorry, aristocracy. Just looked it up and it's correct. The queen cannot be tried here because it would be, 'Her Majesty's
Advocate V Her Majesty'. But the allegations against him are in
America, so good luck with getting him deported.
We have
an election coming up soon. Why don't we do what we should have done
years ago, and make the bastards accountable? We want cheaper fuel. Gas
and electricity prices should fall when they fall for the companies.
We want open and accountable banks that work to spread the wealth of
the country evenly, and not just to one percent of the population. We want
a national health service that is full of doctors and nurses and not
middle management! And we don't want any more blame culture: you run
the country, you are to blame. The buck stops at the top!
No comments:
Post a Comment